By Marcela Ayres and Jamie McGeever
BRASILIA (Reuters) – A key figure in Brazil’s plans to reform the country’s complex tax system was fired on Wednesday, government sources told Reuters, reflecting disagreements in cabinet about the form legislation should take.
The departure of Marcos Cintra, special secretary to Brazil’s federal revenue service, was confirmed in a statement from the Economy Ministry.
Local media reported on Tuesday that a senior member of Cintra’s team had outlined a financial transactions tax at a rate of 0.2%-0.4% modeled on the unpopular “CPMF” tax introduced in 1993 and abolished in 2007.
President Jair Bolosnaro later tweeted that Cintra was dismissed due to “differences” over the government’s tax reform bill, particularly reintroducing a version of the CPMF.
Bolsonaro tweeted that he will rule out a reintroduction of a CPMF tax or an increase in the tax burden, putting him at odds with Economy Minister Paulo Guedes, an ardent supporter of a transactions tax.
Bolsonaro said last month he would be open to discussing it with Guedes, but his tweet on Wednesday suggested that was no longer the case.
In its statement, the Economy Ministry said Guedes and team were working on a new tax regime “to simplify standards, reduce costs, lighten the tax burden on households and business.”
“The proposal will only be released after the approval of Minister Paulo Guedes and President Jair Bolsonaro,” it said, adding that Guedes thanked Cintra for his service and Jose de Assis Ferraz will temporarily assume the position.
One source told Reuters that Guedes decided Cintra should be dismissed because he spoke about the issue publicly even though he had not fully drafted his proposals, and he never appeared in front of lawmakers to answer questions.
Guedes has said publicly on numerous occasions that a new CPMF should be part of the reformed tax system. He and others argue that a financial transaction tax would be simple to implement and collect and provide a steady revenue stream for the government.
But critics from across the political and economic spectrum say it is regressive and hits the poor hardest. The CPMF, which taxed all financial transactions including checks, was unpopular when it was in place, and opposition to it being resurrected in any form runs deep.Tax reform is the government’s main economic priority in the second half of this year, after it pushed social security reform to the brink of full Congressional approval in the first half.
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.